Discuss the Relationship Between Dada and Punk

Discuss the Relationship Between popping and tinder. Within this essay I exit be exploring the close relationship between public address system and mettle. protoactinium and yobbo atomic number 18 twain bms which were utilize to express a social change inwardly their succession, by fine contrivance, carriage and music. Although the soda pop strawman was at its peak in 1916 to 1922 and the Punk move workforcet st stratagemed in the mid 1970s, both exhibition the same ideologies and techniques towards they work.Through expose the essay I will break d suffer each of the movements into certain groups and analyzes the akinities between both of them. To understand the developments of both movements, you need to understand the environment in which they were formed. Dada st stratagemed in 1916, two years after World War 1 st fines contactd. World War 1 was a complicated war, involving many countries winning sides due to the conflict between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, t he conflict was brought to a head in the battle of the Somme, France, 1916.This was when many trickists, writers and others took refuge in Zurich, Switzerland, which was neutral during the war, many were idle at what was happening to the world, within the book daddy, Huelsenbeck (2004, pg 8) submitd N unmatchable of us had any understanding for the courage that is needed to al deplorable matchlessself to be throw dead for the motif of the nation , they were disgusted by the war and the intellection that the nations public would support such violence, and they were frustrated with having no fancy over what was happening, a similar finding the forecastdys had in the 1970s.Dadaism was slightly rebelling against the war, they wanted to apply the control sticker and the only when way they could was through art, Huelsenbeck (2004 pg 17) quoted DADA means nonhing. We want to change the world with nonhing, it is unaccented to see Dadaist felt the modern world they were n ow living in was hollow and so wanted to reject all traditions, especially art tradition, so they decided to establish non-art which had no meaning to go with the meaningless world, they took some control back. The Punks had a similar attitude, they wanted to take back control of their future.The Punk movement started in the mid 1970s, a reply against the recess. A recession which affected intimately of the working class, due to strikes, triad day weeks and lack of opportunity, very different if you compare it to the days of the 1960s, where jejuneness culture exploded on to the scene, free love and England was swinging. Due to the recession the y give awayh of the working class felt failed and disillusioned, a feeling exhibitionn in the Sex Pistols song idol besides The top executive(1977) Dont be told what you want, Dont be told what you need, at that places no future, no future, No Future for you.The seamys felt interchangeable they had no voice, no power and no fut ure so they wanted to make a statement, and comparable Dada, they wanted to take back control and the only way they could do this was through art, music and invent. physique 1, Dada It seems both movements were angry over the situation they were living in, and community will only live under that strain until an outburst happens, and when society does snap, people will want change. For the two movements they standed, Dada protested against the War and the bourgeois flag-waving(a) who they felt was the root of the war, while punks protested against the initiation.The Dadaist, George Grosz once stated that his work was a protest against the world of mutual destruction, a quote which fits rise with the Dadaist but similarly the Punks, they employ destruction of tradition as the protest against the destructive world. It is clear to see that the Punk movement looked up to Dada, barely looking at Jamie Reids work and you can Dadas influence by their use of type and the DIY look, same ideologies, there was even off a fanzine issue called Dada which compared Punk to Dada, shown in Image 1 on the right.The Punks were well known for having left winged views, but actually like most movements had many different political views. The main ideas of the movement was individual freedom and anti-establishment, Dada also had the same ideas to this affect, they believed in freedom, thats why they started in Switzerland, a neutral country, they wanted to pee-pee art in their own way without using any of the tradition rules. opposite Punks ideas were anti-authoritarianism, DIY ethics, direct action, non-conformity and not selling out.All relevant to Dada, but I feel the idea of non conformity Image 2,The Punk Look describes the movements best, the Image 2 best shows how the Punk didnt conform, they use cuff fashion to state who they were and what they stood for, fashion like this in the 1970s scared people, no one had seen fashion like it, the safety pins, ripped edg es and bondage like clothes was a very violent looking dress sense, but Punk wasnt the only movement which use shock tactics, Dada employ shock art, well what would have been shock art in the 1900s, About. om (2012) stated, The Dadaists thrust balmy obscenities, scatological Image 3, Fountain humour, visual puns and everyday objects (renamed as art) into the public eye. , the public still use to traditional art plant Dadaism disgusting, a example of this is Marcel Duchamp Foundation, Image 3 on the right, by today standards very normal by the art world but in the 1900s, ready-made art wasnt let on of, wouldnt been classed as art, and so Duchamp shocked people by suggesting this is art, plead the question what is art? , something which hadnt been questioned in such expressive style. Image 4, God Save The mogul Within both movements shock art was utilise to state they ideologies, the best two examples I feel show how the movements are similar are, Jamie Reids God Save the Queen , Image 4, one of my personal favourites, also one of the most iconic tokens of the punk movement, used for the Sex Pistols cover God save the Queen, and Marcel Duchamps L. H. O. O. Q , can been seen under project5.These two go through show what the movements are somewhat, Marcel Duchamp took one of the most iconic motion-picture show and defaced it, not as a joke or because he disliked the painting but he what to state what the Dadaist believed, that traditional art had been exhausted and it was sequence for a change. Although Duchamp wasnt anti-art but he wanted, and I quote Elger (2004, pg 82) to have new, previously unasked questions about art. While the border regions of art had not been explored. , Duchamp used the Mona Lisa as a emblem of traditional art and wanted to deface it to show the art world that he has no respects for traditions, not even for Leonardos untouchable masterpiece. , Elger (2004, pg 82). Image 5, Mona Lisa The same idea was used in Jamie Reids Go d Save the Queen, (Image 4), Reid took a image of the queen, which acted as a symbol of the establishment and authority, just like the Mona Lisa was a symbol for Dada, and Reid deface her by blanking out the eye and mouth, like a common criminal to make out she, the authority, committing a crime.Just like Dada was anti-art, Punk was anti-design, looking at image 4 you can see the DIY attitude and look allowing amateur designers to create own poster and fanzines, allowing everyone to be free to create what they want, about they own opinions, this is another link to Dada, slightly with the Mona Lisa with Duchamp taking a ready-made image and pencilling on top, but mostly with other Dadaist work with college.The ransom style lettering gives a threat on the queen, and so the design is acting like a threat to authority again showing the Punk anti-establishment ideas and how they want to take down the system, just like the Dadaist wanted to take down the idea of the traditional art syste m. Within the design Reid uses a union shit for the background, which adds colour to the design but also the adept was released the weekend of the Queens silver jubilee and so the union jack marks a personal attack at Britain and our tradition, as the Punks saw the queen as the enemy.Dada wasnt the only one who used the Mona Lisa, the Punks used her for a gallery opening, again the image was defaced, with smashed glass and nebuliser paint, like a riot had happened. I believed they used this image not because it was a gallery opening but she was a sign of the wealthiness and tradition of the art world and the rest of the world to show everyone the Punk movement is here and you cant ignore it, just like Duchamps Mona Lisa. Image 6, Rrose Selavy Image 7, Soo Cat womanhood Dada and Punk were not only ahead in their art work and ideas, but socially and with the persona of women too.When Dada was at its peak the role of women was changing, women were working, the suffrage movement, the idea of possess control and the decline in the male population, Dada was the perfect time for women to make a stand, seeing as it was a time for change. raze Duchamp appreciated the role of women and their creative role, even to the point where Duchamp dressed as a woman, Rrose Selavy, as seen on the left. Rrose Selavy was used to shock but also show there is no clear boundary between men and women, and when you look to the Punks and the way they dressed, men and womens style was very similar.Image 7 is a photo of Soo Catwoman, she is very iconic to the Punk movement, she was the ultimate Punk. The Punk movement stated by Hickman (2011),The women of punk conceived new ways to act with their bodies, gender and punk culture as a whole. the role of women in the movement was very equal for the 1970s, it was a great way to show to the world that women had a right and a voice, so shock fashion like Soo Catwoman really stated what the punk women stood for, and the fact they arent t hese easygoing creatures who should be seen and not heard.Image 8, Orgasm Addict It was during the Punk movement where womanish graphic designers were becoming influential. Linder Sterling is a well known punk artist, designing for the Buzzcocks, one of the designs is image 8, like Reid, Sterling uses college techniques and the DIY look to create the cover, sterling (1977) quoted, It was made in aSalfordbedroom, I had a poll of glass, a scalpel and piles of womens mags. This technique would have been used with most of the punk designer because it adds a raw edge to the design.This DIY techniques was also used with Dada, as seen in image 9, The Art Critic by Raoul Hausmann, you can see the similarities between the two image, both use college and in image 9, the eyes and mouth have been upstage again defacing the person. The idea of college was yet becoming rebellion against the art world because it was a new idea and not done before, the technique was developed due to the war be cause art supplies were low so they used whatever was around them and this meant college.Image 9, The Art Critic From image 8 you can the techniques used by many punk artists, within they work they usually focus on one figure in which they deface, like in image 8, although the iron may represent the idea of a womans role, as the iron is a symbol of the home and house work, which is a role that has been assigned to women, while the mouths on the nipples suggest a idea of sexuality and this is the only part of the woman which makes people, mainly men, happy.With image 10 Hausmann has removed the eyes and mouth because of this it has removed the humanity of the person like Sterlings cover. Also with most Punk and Dada work primary colours would be used to make the isolated image stand out and give it more(prenominal) of a contrast and give it more of a harsh, violent look. In summary it is clear to see the relationship between Dada and Punk. The movements had similar backgrounds, simi lar ideologies and similar techniques when creating their work.The ways they protested against their situation, Dada with anti-art and the Punks with anti-design, shows the two movements linked and for Punks it seems they looked up to Dada, just looking at the similarities between Reids college techniques compared to a Dadaism piece like Raoul Hausmanns The Art Critic, you can see the influence. Personally I feel the two go hand in hand, both movements hold an important place in art history, and with me, I have always loved the Punk movement and learning about Dada has helped me understand the history of art and I feel without Dada we wouldnt have Punk.