Whether Or Not Armed Security Guards Should Be In Schools?

Whether or not arm bail obtains should be in instills has been a debate for years exclusively has re altogethery been brought into the public eye since the most recent tragedies of aquilegia, Virginia Tech and Sandy gazump. The supporters of having arm security in our indoctrinate districts believe that it is a needed layer of security and succors to lower response prison term if necessary age keeping squirtren, p arents and teachers looking ating preventativer to be in condition. The is against having guns in the conditions believe that we give way had build up guards in schools and it did zip to control it.They also believe that the salute is too high sequence also worrying slightly their childrens psyche from being or so oppressed weapons every(prenominal) day. No matter which side you are on, in that location are great arguments for both sides that are logical as rise as emotional and it is everyones job to listen to all of the reading that is ava il subject and shake up their decision based on what they feel is the outper manikin choice. That choice could be one of the most important decisions that they ever pass because it could mean the difference mingled with vitality and death.Sandy Hook Elementary School, Columbine High School, Virginia Tech, and the University of Texas at Austin were some of the most televised and the deadliest school flutterings that mystify ever occurred in the United States. Since 1992, there have been all oer 387 school shootings which are way too many for the United States which poses the question, why did these tragedies receive in the first place? If we had build up security guards or a military/police presence at our institutions of development and higher acquisition would these tragedies have been prevented or could there have been less loss of life?The answer is that having an armed guard would not have prevented these attacks from individuals whose entire determination was to com mit murder. Look at Columbine and Virginia Tech, both of these facilities had armed guards on their campus and it did nothing to stop the attack. The attackers observed the guards behaviors and learned their routines for patrolling and made their moves when they could get past the guards without detection.This also raises the question is if the school is liable for the deaths of these students since they had handy professionals on state of affairs and they did nothing to stop the attack could the school be charged with disrespect? So with the evidence of having two of the most brutal school shootings of all beat happen while armed security was present, what makes you conceptualise that they could stop an incident somewhere else? Deciding whether or not armed security would actually stop an attack is important but so is figuring out how to pay such high costs to have these armed personnel on site to protect our children.Most schools are struggling as it is to keep viable progra ms such as the arts running while also trying to keep their schools staffed with teachers and other personnel. How could they even fathom salaried more money for security when they bumnot even keep an art tier going? The average salary for armed security guards across the plain is virtually $55,000 per year then you have to factor in training, equipment, uniforms, and benefits so, on average a school would have to pay $100,000 per year for one security guard for their school.Now some school districts only have a few schools but others have a parcel out more and they would have a hard time paying for that. Of course, a lot of bulk would argue that you should not put a price tag on our childrens refuge but in many cases the price of their educations would light because less money would be spent there to be able to pay for security. Could a school district along with the parents choose to hold back education away from the students in order to add armed guards in the chance th at something goes wrong?Education is a key component in raising a smart, self-sufficient adult. The other factor that becomes a distinguish of cost is having the money to pay for the lawyers and incidentals in the chance that the security guard acted inappropriately. What if there is an accidental shooting or a guard becomes over zealous in what they feel that their responsibilities are? These factors could lead to study lawsuits that the school would be responsible for by either having to represent that officer or in paying settlement and court costs for a lawsuit.These are added costs that the majority of the schools across the United States cannot afford to take on. The safety of schools have been tested more in the recent years with discussion coverage of the most recent incident in Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, where twenty children and six staff members woolly-headed their lives. With the recent rise of school shootings it is no wonder parents are relate for their childrens safety in schools.Where drugs and peer pressure were once major concerns, in todays society, we worry about our children dying in the hands of armed grinders. While there is much controversy over how to protect the future of Americas children, lawmakers are supporting a bill to allow armed guards to stand and protect our children in the school systems by creating laws to allow armed security in the schools. The Indiana amendments sponsor, Rep. Jim Lucas (R), say he believes mass shootings analogous the one in Newtown could be prevented by more parentarms. (Resmovits, 2013).In support of armed guards, the National Rifle Association has give for research and strand among the studys central conclusions is that the presence of armed security personnel adds a layer of security and diminishes response time in a shooting, (Asa) Hutchinson said. (Asa Hutchinson) cited a 1997 Mississippi incident in which an appurtenant principal ran to his truck to retriev e a . 45-caliber semiautomatic pistol and flaccid a gunman who had al ready(a) shot two students (Stolberg). New commandment would allow armed teachers, staff members, or on-duty patrols to respond if a speckle were to occur.The (National Rifle Associations) model legislation would lift restrictions on guns in schools and take away specific training for school employees who choose to carry guns. (Resmovits, 2013). In this time of uncertainty, President Barack Obama, is trying to pass stricter gun laws. As President Obama tries to gestate a reluctant Congress to pass new gun laws, the canvas found that a majority of Americans -54 percent- think gun control laws should be tightened, up markedly from a CBS News poll last April that found that only 39 percent backed stricter laws. (Cooper and Sussman, 2013). on that point is much speculation this amplification could be as a result of the Newtown shooting. Meaning muckle are seeking security, parents are worried for their child ren, and there is widespread fear of a point like Newtown ever happening again. Which brings us back to our moot view, why is having an armed guard important? Having an armed guard exponent also dissuade any possible stabs from attempting to attack the school, avoiding the situation altogether. The armed guard would be a figure of authority and possible determent of any gunmen.As the saying goes you cant bring a wound to a gun fight therefore it would be hasty to think schools can stop armed intruders with anything other than a gun itself. normally these gunmen are suicidal and seeking attention, where they understand their outcome is death, therefore restraining is not enough. A gunman at this level would not hesitate to shoot first, regardless of who is in their way, which is why having someone on site ready to respond and taken the gunman down is an ideal solution. As a parent there is nothing more important than keeping your kids safe and the same goes for a teacher and th eir students.Many parents feel that whatever a school needs to do to keep their children safe they are more than ordain to agree with. Teachers feel more relaxed that they have someone there to help them in an emergency situation that can help protect the children and children feel safer knowing that they have someone to turn to when their parents are not around to protect them. Some bulk might argue that having a loaded gun in the school might mess with a childs mental state because it makes them feel that guns are the only form of protection so they would prefer them not to be there.The reality of the situation is that we live in a world that can be tragical and devastating at times and a lot of kids are squeeze to see things that are way beyond their years and they are percentage that no child should have to deal with. But, the great thing about kids is that they are resilient and very smart and with the proper education could be taught about right and wrong and why they nee d to have armed security guards at school. It is just like explaining to your kids how to dial 911 or where in the house the smoke detectors and fire extinguishers are.You also make your kids wear seatbelts and roulette wheel helmets to protect them so that they do not get hurt in case of an accident. Parents do these things not to scare their kids but to prepare them in case of emergencies. Children are not equipped to handle an active shooter in school nor should they ever be expected to just like you would not teach a child how to fight a fire but teaching them that this person(s) on campus are there to protect them in that small chance that someone comes into their classroom wishing to do them harm.Parents and teachers would sock nothing more than to let their children believe that the world is filled with rainbows and gaffe bears but the reality is that it is not and no matter how much people try to protect children from evil you are doing them a disservice by not telling th em the truth. It would be morally wrong to lie to children and to make them feel safe when there is a potential for danger. Ethically it is the province as parents and teachers to teach children that there whitethorn be evil in the world but there is also a lot of trustworthy and that there are always people here to protect us.Making a child feel safe and secure while also do the parents and teachers that are responsible for these kids is clearly more important than what it might cost or the possibility that having proper security might possibly fail. There have been too many shooting incidents in the United States but who knows the number of shootings that were prevented because a school chose to have security on campus. congruous knowledge and training is key to making sure that these security guards can do there jobs to protect the innocent.Another option for a school that may not have the financial resources is to hire off-duty police officers to work expatiate on there day s off because this would cost a lot less and you are guaranteed to have highly trained and dedicated people willing to put their life on the line for your children. As a society why are we more willing to pay for happen upon brand clothes for our kids then add security that can ease their lives?During a situation as horrific as an active shooter in a school is a serious issue that unluckily is our reality today and we have to prepare that it could happen and having armed and trained security personnel on site could mean the matter between life and death and is this something we really want to chance because of money or the possibility that it is for nothing? We do not get into car accidents every day but we always make sure that are children are buckled up so why should adding security measures to schools be any diametrical?