Free Trade :: essays research papers

American political Science ReviewVol. 94, No.2 June 2000"Free to Trade Democracies, Autocracies, and Inter interior(a) Trade"     The exchange question that is explored in this article is what kind of political governance is outgo for free trading in interior(prenominal) or international commerce. At the same time it address the variation between democracy and autocracy, non on variation within either regime type. Some of the study articles discussed in the authors review of the literature are the pretenders and their preferences such actors as the principal executive and legislatures in a democracy and a unitary actor in autocracy. Also mentions one of the major aspect of trade, the noncooperative trade obstruction settings. Which usually happens when countries do not agree to mutual trade settings. The opposite article in the literature tends to compare the level of trade barriers and regime type. It does this by looking at the level of trade barriers across the leash types of regime pairs if trade barriers are lower with in democracy pairs than pairs cool of an autocracy and a democracy.      The principal hypothesis the authors seek to test is "the check responsibility of the legislature in democratic states leads pairs of democracies to set trade barriers at a lower level than mixed country-pairs." The major independent variables apply in this article are political economy of trade policy, domestic political institutions and commercial policy. The dependent variables are foreign policy of the manifold countries and the chief executive. In order to collect data and analysis, the authors used the national income and population of both trading partners, as well as the geographical distance between them. They also looked at the competitiveness of the process through with(predicate) which a countrys chief executive is selected, the openness of that process, the competitiveness of