How can Employees be Empowered to Increase Productivity?

How earth-closet Employees be Em berthed to Increase Productivity?1.Preliminary titleEmpowerment is inseparable to increase productivity among employee.2.Research purposeThe out come of employee say-so in serve effort hindquarters direct long-term success. The purpose of this query is to analyse and come upon in-depth intimacy and understanding on employee authorisation in the context of service exertion by comparing the perspective of passenger vehicle and employee. And provide suggestions to service industry how to gain more(prenominal) cultivablely done empower the employee. This result will be obtained by testing the power of the employee empowerment variables. The earlier discussion on employee empowerment in the service industry has lead to the main(prenominal) research question.How employee fire be appoint for increasing productivity?What competitive advantage employee empowerment can hire for the corporation?3.RationalOn this era, the arrival of an i nstruction-based, knowledge-intensive, service driven economy has compel a massive of change on companies worldwide, most dramatically in the way they moldiness redefine their relationship with their employees (Bartlett 2002). Hill and Huq (2004) argued that specifically, it emanated from the realization that tralatitious hierarchical command and pull wires organizations were struggling to meet the growing demands for tr sufficeableness and demands for flexibility and quality. The employees respond most excellent and creatively not when worry does tightly control them, placed in narrowly defined line of business and treated like unwelcoming necessity. But instead, when they argon checkn broader responsibilities, and encouraged to contribute and help to take satisfaction in their jobs (Walton 1985). Thats why now a day, employee of organization and how management manages them be becoming more important beca mapping umteen other source of competitive success is less powerful than they at once were.Traditional sources of success- technology, protected or regulated market, access to financial alternative and economies of scale can still provide competitive advantage, but to a lesser degree now than in the past, leaving organizational stopping point and capabilities, derived from how people are managed, as comparatively more vital (Henry and Maryle, 2002). As, organizations sustainable competitive advantage is its people that why management need to ask all the human resource to active attach tos long time success. In the modern world Empowerment is one of the key tools, which a director can use frequently to involve and manage organizations people to achieve competitive advantage. As Campbell (2009,p8) pointed out that People are your most expensive asset. To get the most out of employees, empower is essential.4.Literature review4.1.What is employee empowerment?The subscribe of Empowerment to create a culture where employee have freedom to point t hemselves and have the liberty to make decisions about how they get, where there is always the luck to give constructive feedback, and where anyone is equal and approachable (Beaven 2009). So Empowerment implies give up central control, which will encourage speed, flexibility and determination of the employee. match to Campbell (2009), main meaning of empower employees is to give up some aspects of control. In return for giving up that control, managers will have more area and time to look at the big picture and engage in strategic thinking. Styhre (2001) illustrated that empowermentis depicted by its proponents as the common denominator for recent managerial techniques and activities that acknowledge the individual employee as an intelligent, accountable, creative being, and therefore a productive resource for the company. Lashley (1997) argued that it is intended that through empowerment employees will be more committed to successful service encounters and will have the necess ary diplomacy and autonomy to do whatever is needed to satisfy the node.4.2 .How to apply empowerment to increase productivity among employee?Different organizations choose to empower their employees to different degrees at the lowest level empowerment the employee has no autonomy to take decision. On the other hand, at the highest level the employee is given decision-making authority and can control their own performances( Daft ,2001). All these employees are often able to incite organizational goals, structure, as well as reward systems.In ramble to empower employees, four different factors are Important. Those different factor work as an element to empower employee. Which will give the employees space to act more independently in accomplishing their jobs. According to Daft (2000) those are information, knowledge, power and rewards.Information In any organizations where the employees are fully empowered, no information about the company is held secret for employee. Thats why e mployees must receive ein truth information about the performance of the company.2.Knowledge Before and after empowering employees every company need to give training for increasing knowledge and skills of employee. Which build up their problem solving decision-making capability. As by having power of knowledge and skills, an employee can be able to contribute to the goals of the company.Power To make substantial decisions, employees must have the power. Which will increase employee involvement, confidante.Rewarding The employees need to get rewarded on the basis their performances and companys performance. The employees can be more committed towards the company by having true appreciation through psychologically and physically.4.3.AdvantagesAccording to the literature, empowerment bring many positive result for the company like, quicker response to customer, chat and teamwork, employee satisfaction and increase their working value, reduce costs and economic profits, involvement, c ustomer satisfaction/ recovery, increased employee efficiency, customer loyalty and new innovative inclination for the organization (Campbell, 2009 Beaven, 2009 Bowen Lawler, 2002 Styhre ,2001 Lashley, 1997). Empowered employee is more productive, psychologically and physically healthy, proactive and innovative, dogged in the work place, trustworthy, interpersonally efficient, intrinsically motivated, and have higher morale and inscription than employee who are not empowered (Whitten , 2007).Earlier literature review has illustrated that empowerment can play a very vital rule in influence to increases productivity among employees. Research need to be taken in run to gain better understanding this phenomenon on the context of evidence service industry. Now, research method need to chosen in order to complete the research successfully.5.Research Methodology5.1.Research approachRossman and Rallis (2003) stated that there are two different research methods that are frequently use d when researchers are about to conduct research the qualitative and the denary method. A quantitative method is mostly concern with measurements and to generalize the result.This means that qualitative research mostly humanistic research, which makes it possible to interpret as well as understand a phenomenon. The purpose of this research is to analytic thinking and achieves depth knowledge and understanding on employee empowerment in the context of service industry by comparing the perspective of manager and employee. And provide suggestions to service industry to gain more productively through empower the employee. As this is a humanistic research qualitative approach will be very effective to do in-depth investigation.5.2.SamplingThe researcher will select two service-oriented company to carry on sampling process. The reason for exploring different venues is to gather invaluable information from different source. The method of contact to manager of relevant company for arran ging interview session with manager and employee will through boldness-to-face, phone, or e-mail.5.3.Data solicitation methodAccording to Silverman (2001), there are four main methods used in qualitative research areObservationAnalyzing texts and documentsInterviewsRecordings and transcribing.The selective information will be conducted for the research in two distinct stages by the researcher to carry on this research. A short period of ceremonial occasion there will be done in the first stage. marshal and Rossman (1999) demonstrated that observation entails the systematic nothing and recording of events, behaviours and artifact (objects) in the social setting chose for the study. At the second stage of the data collection will be involved a series of semi-structured, in-depth face to face interview with employee and manager with in selected organization.5.4.Data analysis proceduresMarshall and Rossman (1999) suggest that data analysis is the process of bringing order, structure and interpretation to the mass of peaceful data. Miles (1994) have demonstrated two models for analysis. The first one is researcher can analyze a separate case (within-case analysis). Then presents results by creating tables, checklists and ground substance around compile, qualitative data by comparing the theory with confirmable data in these tables and checklists. It will be easy to see similarities and differences on this model. At The second model, the researcher compares the results from different cases in a cross-case analysis. detective will follow the first model where comparison will be made between literature and empirical data which be collected from manager and employee. The comparison will be done in order to identify patterns that would similar or different from the theory or literature.5.5.Data arrestAt the time of depth face-to-face interviews with interviewees, research will use voice recorder that he can give more wariness on interview. Then researcher will transcribe date fordata analysis procedure, it has probable that the result would bring more accuracy.5.6.Reliability and validityTo ensure dependableness and validity, every face-to-face interview will be recorded and transcribed. Silverman, D (2001) argued that the quality of recording and transcripts has important implications on the reliability of conversation analytic research. For this reason, every transcription will be coded.5.7.Proposed time schedule anticipate 12 weeks of period has allocated for conducting this masters research. Following this a proposed time schedule would be as followPeriodActivity1st 2 weekInitial literature reviewNext 2 weekComplete participant observationNext 4 week initialise and conduct interviews transcribe and analyse interview dataNext 2Literature and further analysis of dataRest of the week print up and submit completed thesisReferenceBartlett, Christopher A., Ghoshal and Sumantra (2002). BuildingCompetitiveAdvantage ThroughPeople. MIT Sloa n Management Review. Vol. 43 Issue 2.pp.34-41.Beaven, D.2009. People make the difference.Logistics Transport Focus. Vol. 11 Issue 6, pp45-47.Bowen, D.E. and Lawler, E.E. 2002. The empowerment of service workers What, why, how and when. In Henry. J and Mayle.D.ed. Managing substructure and change, Open University Business School, in association with sage, pp.243-273.Campbell, G.2009.Employee Empowerment. superior.Vol.48 Issue 4, p 8.Daft, R. 2001. Organization Theory and Design, 7th Edition. South-Western College. Thompson Learning.Henry, J., Mayle, D.2002. Managing innovation and change. Open University Business School, in association with SAGE.pp61-73.Hill, F., Huq, R.2004. Employee Empowerment Conceptualizations, Aims and Outcomes. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, Vol. 15 Issue 8, pp1025-1041.Lashley, C.1999.Empowering service excellence in service. London Cassell Publications.Miles, M.1994.Qualitative data analysis an expanded sourcebook / Matthew B Miles. Sa ge Publications, Inc.Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.B .1999. figure Qualitative Research. 3rd Ed.London Sage Publications.Rossman, B. G. Rallis F. S. 2003. Learning in the Field An knowledgeability to Qualitative Research.2nd ed. California Sage Publications, Inc.Silverman, D .2001. Interpreting Qualitative data, Methods for Analyzing clack text and Interaction. 2nd Ed.sage London, p.14.Walton, Richard E.1985. Fromcontroltocommitmentintheworkplace. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63 Issue 2. pp77-84.Whetten, David A and Cameron, Kim S.2008. growth management skills. 7th edition, Prentice hall.