Plea Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing Essay -- essays research papers

excuse Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing I would like to take this time to explain my mail service on Plea Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing. I will show both(prenominal) pros and cons for each topic, as well as give you my personal abbreviated on which one I support. There are two types of defense bargains The first one is a charge bargain. When the public prosecutor suspends a defendant to "plead guilty to a lesser charge, or to moreover some of the charges that have been filed against him. For example, a defendant charged with burglary may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to "attempted burglary". A defendant charged with Drunk Driving and Driving with License Suspended may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to just the drunk driving charge. The plunk for plea bargain is when a defendant is told in advance what his clock time will be if he pleads guilty. This can help a prosecutor obtain a conviction if, for example, a defendant is facing sound charges and is afraid of being hit with the "maximum" sentence. Typically, sentence bargains can only be granted if they are approved by the trial judge. some(prenominal) jurisdictions severely limit sentence bargaining.Sentence bargaining sometimes occurs in high profile cases where the prosecutor does not want to reduce the charges against the defendant, usually for fear of how the newspapers will react. A sentence bargain may allow the prosecutor to obtain a conviction to the most serious charge, slice assuring the defendant of an a...