Justice After War :: essays research papers fc

Justice after WarHistory Wars Writing lineWartime is definitely a time of much violence and many things pop off during this time, but what about after warThe just war tradition is typic totallyy evoked when contending the decision to launch a war (justice of war) and when evaluating the treat of forces during war (justice in war). But the tradition does not explicitly specialise principles for assessing justice after war, nor does it discuss state obligations upon achieving military victory. This excerpt was interpreted from an article by Tony Lang and Mary-Lea Cox. Once victory is earned by angiotensin converting enzyme side it must take responsibility to pave the road to tranquillity in that country by building a new policy-making system. This is summarized in Thomas L. Freidmans view when he says you break it, you profess it. But maintaining peace in war-trodden country is not easy. There is jealousy from that country, the urge to take visit while this is happening t he victors convey to discuss how to maintain justice. Maintaining the balance between these two is a tedious task. In many conflicts through history the aftermath has been more of a enigma to the defeated than the war itself, becoming financially crippled, becoming underdogs of the world, being restricted. These are all problems faced by the dark horse of the battle, after a battle keeping a stability of even-handedness and retribution is a daunt task.Many trials through time have been subject to comments by critics that have made points that justice had no role in the final judgement. In the Nuremberg Trials, of the 21 defendants that were held in custody 11 were sentenced to death (over 50%), triad were acquitted and the rest were subject to heavy jail terms. The Nazi atrocities that they were tack on trial for were for good reason, though they had been wishing to give them all a fair trial it is obvious that excessive urges to take revenge caused an imbalance in the balance between revenge and justice. Those to be prosecuted were through so because of the brutal war crimes, crimes against peace and crimes against humanity they had committed. The prosecutors were dominated by a large percentage of Jews, who at this time, excusably, had a fervent hatred for the Nazis, since the Nazis had also had a fervent hatred for them. But this just shows how weighty it would have been for these prosecutors to not have had revenge govern their thoughts throughout the trial.